MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3031948856 · doi:10.19137/pys-2020-270103

Universal Child Allowance and Educational Deprivation in Argentina

2020· article· es· W3031948856 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePoblación & Sociedad · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllowance (engineering)AcronymPovertySocial deprivationPsychologyEconomic growthDemographic economicsSocioeconomicsSociologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this paper is to estimate differences in educational deprivation between boys and girls, beneficiaries and non beneficiaries, of the program Universal Child Allowance. This study uses data from the National Survey of Social Protection (ENAPROSS Spanish acronym) that identifies recipients directly, to assess the impact over educational deprivation indicators and over a summary indicator of these deprivations. Results reveal strong gender disparities in educational deprivation confirming some previous inquiries results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.288
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoblación & SociedadSame topicPoverty, Education, and Child WelfareFrench-language works237,207