MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Detection of urothelial carcinoma using plasma cell-free methylated DNA.

2020· article· en· W3032077319 on OpenAlexaff
Pier Vitale Nuzzo, Sándor Spisák, Jacob E. Berchuck, Sylvan C. Baca, Keegan Korthauer, Amin H. Nassar, Sarah Abou Alaiwi, Ziad Bakouny, Ronan Flippot, John A. Steinharter, Catherine Curran, Gwo‐Shu Mary Lee, Sushrut S. Waikar, Mark M. Pomerantz, Daniel D. De Carvalho, Guru Sonpavde, Matthew L. Freedman, Toni K. Choueiri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDana-Farber Cancer Institute
KeywordsDifferentially methylated regionsBladder cancerDNA methylationCell-free fetal DNABisulfite sequencingMedicineMethylated DNA immunoprecipitationEpigeneticsMolecular biologyCancer researchOncologyCancerInternal medicineBiologyGeneGene expressionGeneticsFetusPrenatal diagnosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5046 Background: Methylation profiling of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising approach for non-invasive tumor detection due to the presence of tissue-specific epigenetic signatures that are detectable in cfDNA. Cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing (cfMedDIP-seq) is a sensitive, low-input, cost-effective, bisulfite-free approach to profiling cfDNA methylomes, capable of detecting and classifying various tumor types. We tested the feasibility of cfMeDIP-seq to detect urothelial carcinoma (UC) in plasma samples. Methods: We performed cfMeDIP-seq on plasma samples from 43 patients (pts): 18 metastatic UC (UC) pts, 12 pre-cystectomy non-metastatic UC pts, and 13 cancer-free controls. Six (50%) of pre-cystectomy cases were non-muscle invasive UC. cfDNA was immunoprecipitated and enriched using an antibody targeting 5-methylcytosine and PCR-amplified to create a sequence-ready library. The top differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between UC and control samples were used to train a regularized binomial generalized linear model using 80% of the samples as a training set. The 20% of withheld test samples were then assigned a probability of being UC or control. This process was repeated 100 times. Results: The average amount (standard deviation) of cfDNA isolated from 1 ml of UC plasma samples was 29.2 (27.4) ng/µL and 8.02 (3.58) ng/µL in cancer-free controls. We identified 9,826 DMRs in plasma samples at an adjusted p-value of < 0.01, which partitioned UC and control samples. Iterative training and classification of held out samples using the top 300 DMRs resulted in a mean AUROC of 0.987. Conclusions: cfMeDIP-seq is an interesting new approach for non-invasive detection of UC. cfMeDIP-seq demonstrates high sensitivity to detect UC across all stages of UC, including non-muscle invasive disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→