Information Disclosure and Pricing Policies for Sales of Network Goods
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amazon and Apple, which sell tablet devices, have adopted different implicit information policies and developed distinct “reputations” about their tablets’ sales volume release. With Amazon, “even a number as basic, and presumably impressive, as how many Kindle e-readers the company sells is never released.” With Apple, iPhone and iPad sales numbers are always released, even if they are disappointing. In the paper “Information Disclosure and Pricing Policies for Sales of Network Goods,” the authors study the sales information release policy, disclosure versus nondisclosure, for selling network goods subject to market size uncertainty. They identify two countervailing effects, a prodisclosure “Matthew effect” and an antidisclosure saturation effect, that drive the firms’ sales information disclosure policies. In addition, the authors also study the situation where the firm can decide on an all-or-nothing information disclosure policy together with endogenized prices, including state-independent pricing, contingent preannounced pricing, and contingent pricing without commitment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it