MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Single-fiber conduction study of motor nerve in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy

2015· article· en· W3032167371 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Li Tian, Yan Cheng, Zhecheng Zhang, Na Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueChin J Neurol · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNerve conduction velocityMedicinePeripheral neuropathyMotor nerveDiabetic neuropathyDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineNerve fiberNeurologyPeripheralAnesthesiaEndocrinologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To assess the function of motor nerve fiber in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) by single-fiber conduction studies. Methods According to the diagnostic standard of DPN issued in Toronto meeting in 2009, on the basis of the result of peroneal nerve conventional conduction study, a total of 65 patients with DPN in the Department of Endocrinology and the Department of Neurology of Tianjin Third Central Hospital from October 2012 to October 2013 were enrolled into the study, from whom 33 had abnormal sensory conduction (sensory-diabetic peripheral neuropathy group, S-DPN group), 32 had abnormal sensory motor conduction (sensory motor-diabetic peripheral neuropathy group, SM-DPN group). Single-fiber conduction velocity (SF-CV) and single-fiber distal motor latency (SF-DML) were detected in all subjects. The obtained results were compared with the data from 34 healthy volunteers (control group). The relationship of SF-CV, SF-DML and the duration of diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, HbA1c was also studied in DPN patients. Results The SF-CV ((43.1±3.6) m/s) was decreased in S-DPN group compared with control group((47.5±3.3) m/s, t=5.077, P<0.01). There were no significant differences in SF-DML ((3.6±0.7) ms), motor nerve conduction velocity (MCV (49.5±2.6)m/s)and DML ((3.4±0.6) ms) in S-DPN group compared with that of control group ((3.4±0.5) ms, (50.9±3.5) m/s, (3.2±0.5) ms, respectively). SM-DPN group had lower SF-CV ((35.2±3.6) m/s, t=9.119, 14.219), MCV ((40.9±3.2) m/s, t=11.131, 13.025) and increased SF-DML ((4.5±0.7) ms, t=5.692, 7.231), DML ((4.2±0.7) ms, t=5.561, 6.975) compared with the other two groups (P<0.01). SF-CV in DPN patients was negatively related to the diabetic duration (r=-0.340, P=0.006), while SF-DML had no correlation with duration of DM, fasting blood glucose and HbAlc. Conclusions Detection of SF-CV is easy to find early motor nerve dysfunction in DPN patients. SF-CV is decreased with the increasing duration of diabetes. Key words: Diabetic neuropathies; Motor neurons; Nerve fibers; Neural conduction

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChin J NeurolSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207