MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3032182283

Multimodal Medical Engineering for Precision Medicine and Some Research Topics : 5월 12일 11:30~12:30 (DH 101)

2017· article· ko· W3032182283 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hideaki Haneishi

Bibliographic record

Venue한국감성과학회 춘계학술대회 · 2017
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicBiomedical and Engineering Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)ModalitiesMedical educationPromotion (chess)Engineering managementChinaCore competencyMedicineEngineering ethicsEngineeringMedical physicsPolitical scienceSociologyRadiologyManagement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this project, “Multimodal medical engineering,” we use several modalities such as CT, MRI and US to analyze the variation of cell or organ due to disease by engineering technologies and clarify its relationship. Based on the knowledge obtained there, we aim to establish some new methods for highly precise and non-invasive diagnosis and treatment. This project has an environment that engineering and medical researchers tightly collaborate and conduct a wide range of researches from fundamental study to preclinical and clinical test. Many state-of-the art equipment such CT, MRI, US, endoscope, microscope and apparatus for preparing pathological specimens are also available for promoting the project. In this project, we are also emphasizing the development of human resources through research activities. Students can receive education and advices from both medical and engineering professors. Thanks to active collaboration with companies, students can learn more practical mind in research and development. We also send students in the project to university or institute in foreign countries for long term or short term aiming the development of global human resources. Our project “Multimodal Medical Engineering for Precision Medicine” was also selected as a JSPS (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science) Core-to-Core program 2017 after very tough selection. The project lasts five years. International collaboration researches will be more activated by this support with (University of Eastern Finland (Finland), Thammasat University (Thailand), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (China) and University of Waterloo(Canada). In the presentation, some related research topics will be shortly introduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1810.071

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue한국감성과학회 춘계학술대회Same topicBiomedical and Engineering EducationFrench-language works237,207