Buğday Tohumlarının Derin Sinir Ağı Uygulaması ile Sınıflandırılması
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, applications of neural network and big data have increased rapidly in agriculture-related areas. At the same time, Deep Neural Network (DNN), in which deep layers are used, achieves much better results especially for classification of big datas properly. In this study, a new DNN model is proposed for the classification of wheat seeds which was taken from UCI Machine Learning Repository. There are totally 210 data from 3 different types of wheat, namely; Kama, Rosa and Canadian. The model is divided into 70% train data and 30% test data. When the developed model was applied to dataset, 100% success rate is achieved in classification of data. In addition, 150,000 pieces of synthetic wheat seed data are generated by using a Fuzzy C-Means based algorithm. The proposed model is tested on different train and test data combinations by using UCI wheat seed and synthetically generated datasets, and 100% success rate was achieved in classification. The proposed model shows that it is the best model compared to other studies in the literature for wheat classifications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it