Study of the relationship between the level of HSP70 and the severity of cognitive impairment in adult patients with OSAHS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the relationship between the level of heat shock proteins70 (HSP70) and the severity of cognitive impairment in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).Methods Forty newly diagnosed OSAHS patients by polysomnography were enrolled in our hospital from January 2012 to December 2012.The patients with OSAHS were divided into two groups according to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA):cognitively impaired group and not cognitively impaired group.Forty-four healthy subjects were randomly selected from medical center as normal control.The serum of HSP70 in the two groups were detected by ELISA.Results ① Serum HSP70 level in OSAHS group was significantly higher than that in normal control group(P ＜0.01).②The serum level of HSP70 in cognitively impaired group was significantly higher than that in normal cognitive function group(P ＜0.01).③The correlation analysis revealed that the serum HSP70 level was negatively correlated with the MoCA score in cognitively impaired patients with OSAHS.Conclusions The cognitive impairment in OSAHS patients is associated with the increased level of serum HSP70,HSP70 level may be used as a biochemical indicator for prognose cognitive impairment in OSAHS patients. Key words: Sleep apnea syndrome; Cognitive impairment; Heat shock proteins 70
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".