Interpretation of the best practice guidelines 2017 by Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario—Adult Asthma Care: Promoting Control of Asthma (Second Version)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nurses from all medical environments have close contacts with asthma patients, it can recognize the early indicators of poor asthma control, and provide self-management education and play important roles in the promotion of asthma control. In order to improve the quality of nursing practice in adult asthma control, Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO) in Canada published the guidelines of Adult Asthma Care: Promoting Control of Asthma (Second Version) in 2017 after summarizing the latest evidence in order to provide systematic guidance. This articles analyzed the suggestions in the nursing practice guidelines and introduce the suggestions from all sections including nursing assessment, planning, implementation and evaluation in nursing practice. Key words: Guidebooks; Bronchial asthma; Adult; Asthma control; Interpretation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.064 | 0.282 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".