MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3032684645 · doi:10.4000/communiquer.5424

Donner à toucher, donner à sentir : étude du capitalisme affectif sur mobile

2020· article· fr· W3032684645 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Inès Garmon

Bibliographic record

VenueCommuniquer Revue de communication sociale et publique · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose d’étudier le capitalisme affectif dans sa matérialité et son rapport au corps par l’intermédiaire de ce qui rend le numérique accessible, les gestes de manipulation des interfaces tactiles. Ces outils d’écriture numérique permettent d’interroger la technique et le numérique ainsi que la façon dont celui-ci et ses industries, avec leurs manières de faire et leurs enjeux, pénètrent notre quotidien, nos modes de communication et nos pratiques sociales. Ces manipulations ayant acquis un caractère répétitif, elles sont ainsi popularisées et intégrées aux modèles économiques des plateformes. À l’aide d’une analyse sémiopragmatique de ces gestes, articulant analyses technosémiotiques avec discours d’escorte et imaginaires des utilisateurs, nous allons voir que le capitalisme affectif les instrumentalise et produit de nouvelles formes communicationnelles. Au cœur d’une relation de confiance entre utilisateurs et concepteurs, ces manipulations, en tant qu’expérience vécue acceptée par les publics, s’établissent comme pratique constitutive du capitalisme affectif contemporain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommuniquer Revue de communication sociale et publiqueSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207