MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3032845510

The Effect of Walkability on the Prevalence of Diabetes in Toronto, ON

2020· article· en· W3032845510 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Namra Desai

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWalkabilityEnvironmental healthMedicineType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusPhysical activityIndex (typography)GerontologyPhysical therapyComputer scienceEndocrinology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Walkability describes whether an area is likely to encourage or discourage walking based on infrastructure. The association between walkability index and the prevalence of diabetes exists because of exercise. Areas with a high walkability index are bound to have more pedestrians.12 These pedestrians are individuals who can much more easily obtain their regular exercise than people who primarily use motorized vehicles such as those living in areas of low walkability. The consequence of not attaining a weekly 150 minutes of moderate aerobic activity, which includes walking, is an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes. On top of this, exercise can also prevent hypertension, which increases an individual’s risk of developing diabetes by 52-58%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research JournalSame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207