The study of functional MRI on neuronal activity of primary olfactory cortex in patients with subjective cognitive decline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective Using olfactory task functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the difference in brain olfactory activation between patients with subjective cognitive decline and normal elderly subjects, and to explore the objective image markers for early identification and evaluation the progression from SCD to Alzheimer′s disease (AD). Methods Twenty patients with SCD (SCD group) and twenty matched normal elderly subjects (NC group) were recruited from the community from March 2017 to December 2018. A full neuropsychological scale tests battery, olfactory behavioral tests and olfactory task-fMRI were performed. The differences between olfactory behavior, neuropsychological scales, and task-fMRI brain activation between the two groups were tested. Further, brain regions, which had significantly different activations under task-fMRI, were used as seeds for resting state functional connectivity (FC) analysis. Finally, the correlations between brain activation and olfactory behavior along with clinical neuropsychological scale tests were examined. Results The results of this study showed SCD had a significant decrease in olfactory behavior (olfactory recognition ability) compared with NC (t=-3.042, P<0.01), and there was no statistically significant difference in olfactory threshold. Significant declines were also observed in the SCD self-rating scale (t=6.973, P<0.01), the immediate (t=-4.623, P<0.01) and delayed (t=-2.746, P<0.01) testing of Philadelphia word learning, while the remaining neuropsychological scales were normal. In the olfactory task-fMRI, activation of bilateral primary olfactory cortical regions was significantly reduced in SCD patients, including bilateral entorhinal cortex, amygdala, piriform cortex, anterior olfactory nucleus, and head of the hippocampus. The resting state functional connectivity with the primary olfactory cortex (POC) as the seed showed that the functional connectivity between the olfactory system and the default model network (DMN) of SCD patients was significantly weakened (AlphaSim correction with voxel level P<0.01 and cluster level P<0.05). The Beta value of the left POC was significantly positively correlated with the olfactory threshold and Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) (r=0.329, P=0.041; r=0.317, P=0.046). Partial correlation analysis indicated that there was a significantly positive correlation between the FC of the left POC with the right/left inferior frontal gyrus, the left frontal middle gyrus and the right inferior parietal, and the score of immediate Philadelphia word learning test(r=0.411, P=0.008; r=0.400, P=0.011; r=0.329, P=0.003; r=0.454, P=0.003). The FC between the left POC and the right inferior temporal gyrus was negatively correlated with the score of trail making test (TMT) B, and the FC between the left POC and the right inferior was negatively correlated with score of language fluency test (r=-0.317, P=0.047; r=-0.333, P=0.036). The FC between the right POC and the left inferior parietal was positively correlated with the score of immediate Philadelphia word learning (r=0.315, P=0.048), while the FC between right POC and left middle occipital gyrus was negatively corrected with Language Fluency Test (r=-0.403, P=0.01). Conclusion Olfactory function has been impaired in SCD patients with normal standard cognition and phychiatric rating scales, and the changes in the activation of the primary olfactory cortex, such as the entorhinal cortex, may be an early neural circuit damage biomarker for objective evaluation of SCD. Key words: Subjective cognitive decline; Olfactory perception; Magnetic resonance imaging
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".