Bibliographic record
Abstract
. Contrary to general opinion, the maritime had a non-negligible impact whether in terms of food supplies or naval construction to ensure coastal protection or state income by means of taxation. The few periods in which Chinese emperors invested in a more powerful navy coincided with the country's hegemony in the zone in the dual capacity of prestige and trade. RÉSUMÉ. Contrairement aux idées reçues, le maritime eut un impact non négligeable que ce soit en termes de ressources alimentaires ou de construction navale pour assurer la protection du littoral, et de revenus pour l'Etat par le biais des taxes. Les rares périodes auxquelles les empereurs se dotèrent d'un instrument naval plus puissant coïncident avec l'hégémonie du pays dans la zone au double plan du prestige et du commerce. Though a coastline of some 15,000 kilometers from Korea to Vietnam has historically bounded and defined it, China has a reputation as a continental, not a maritime, empire. This reputation is not entirely misconceived, deriving in part from the sheer size of the land empire, which over two millennia has ballooned into the Eurasian interior to such an extent that it has steadily driven down the ratio of land area to coastline. The Chinese have regularly and consistently interacted with—traded with, escaped into, invaded and been invaded by—the peoples and territories to the north and the west, and most Chinese regimes have formed through the dynamic of that interaction. This in turn has fed a potent myth of cultural origination in the loess hills along the upper reaches of the Yellow River, a myth that continues to persuade the Chinese that they are children of the yellow earth, not progeny of the blue ocean. Historians for three millennia have followed suit, writing China's history as an unbroken sequence of land-based dynasties whose capitals are never port cities and whose military heroes have commanded armies, not armadas. With this idea has coexisted another reality. For, as state and economy have historically expanded toward the interior away from its coastline, simultaneously they have extended in the opposite direction out to sea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".