MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3032937026 · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66145-z

Conditioned medium produced by fibroblasts cultured in low oxygen pressure allows the formation of highly structured capillary-like networks in fibrin gels

2020· article· en· W3032937026 on OpenAlexafffund
Christophe Caneparo, Clément Baratange, Stéphane Chabaud, Stéphane Bolduc

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Urological Association
KeywordsUmbilical veinAngiogenesisFibrinCell biologyChemistryEndothelial stem cellHypoxia (environmental)OxygenBiophysicsImmunologyBiologyBiochemistryIn vitroCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Tissue engineering is an emerging and promising concept to replace or cure failing organs, but its clinical translation currently encounters issues due to the inability to quickly produce inexpensive thick tissues, which are necessary for many applications. To circumvent this problem, we postulate that cells secrete the optimal cocktail required to promote angiogenesis when they are placed in physiological conditions where their oxygen supply is reduced. Thus, dermal fibroblasts were cultivated under hypoxia (2% O2) to condition their cell culture medium. The potential of this conditioned medium was tested for human umbilical vein endothelial cell proliferation and for their ability to form capillary-like networks into fibrin gels. The medium conditioned by dermal fibroblasts under hypoxic conditions (DF-Hx) induced a more significant proliferation of endothelial cells compared to medium conditioned by dermal fibroblasts under normoxic conditions (DF-Nx). In essence, doubling time for endothelial cells in DF-Hx was reduced by 10.4% compared to DF-Nx after 1 week of conditioning, and by 20.3% after 2 weeks. The DF-Hx allowed the formation of more extended and more structured capillary-like networks than DF-Nx or commercially available medium, paving the way to further refinements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207