MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3032977497 · doi:10.18372/2411-264x.16.14684

THE EXPERIENCE OF CANADA’S EDUCATIONAL POLICY AND ITS IMPORTANCE FOR EDUCATIONAL REFORM IN UKRAINE

2020· article· en· W3032977497 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ольга Іванівна Макух, Іванна Макух-Федоркова

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Aviation University Series Pedagogy Psychology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Social Development in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Economic growthPopulationPublic administrationHigher educationPolitical scienceBusinessEconomicsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article describes the Canadian education system and federal higher education funding programs. General scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization, concretization), chronological and causal analysis, method of scientific extrapolation were used in the research. Elements of application of information of the educational process with the purpose of effective development of the sphere of educational services and maintenance of the quality of education are opened. Formation of its high socio-economic standards for the socio-industrial tasks of the country. Educational innovations were supported by the federal and provincial governments, which built cooperation on the part of the public and the country's industrial potential. In the conditions of change of information technologies and development of "economy based on knowledge", conceptual bases of policy in the field of educational change. The Canadian government has made education a priority. The level of education among the population is a key condition for ensuring the competitiveness of the national economy and, consequently, the welfare of the state. The system of higher education in Canada has a long British tradition, the features of which are formed in the provinces of the country. Educational services in universities and colleges depend on the regional economy and private business, which fund a significant part of research projects. As a result, financial funds are being set up in Canada, one of which is the Canadian Innovation Fund, which implements the tasks of the federal government and the provinces. The priority is to help talented young people and involve them in the industrial life of the country. Federal government policy is also aimed at reforming the program of financial accumulation for education in colleges and universities. Canada's educational policy was based on democracy and the national consolidation of its population

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0260.009
Scholarly communication0.0100.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Aviation University Series Pedagogy PsychologySame topicEducation and Social Development in UkraineFrench-language works237,207