MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033139457 · doi:10.32559/et.2019.4.2

Az agrárium versenyképessége az Európai Unióban: fókuszban a tejipar

2019· article· hu· W3033139457 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Judit Nagy, Zsófia Jámbor

Bibliographic record

VenueEurópai Tükör · 2019
Typearticle
Languagehu
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEuropean unionAgricultural economicsAgricultural scienceRevealed comparative advantageBusinessProduction (economics)Consumption (sociology)AgricultureOrder (exchange)Added valueDairy industryQuarter (Canadian coin)International tradeGeographyComparative advantageEconomicsFood scienceEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The European Union produces 15% of its agricultural production in the dairy industry. Furthermore, one quarter of global milk production is produced in this region, and European milk consumption is three times higher than the world average. In 2017, total milk production for the EU28 was 170.1 million tonnes, the vast majority of which is cows’ milk production, 164.8 million tonnes. Consumption of fresh dairy products in EU Member States totalled 30.7 million tonnes of milk and 15.6 million tonnes of other fresh dairy products (Eurostat, 2017). The article focuses on the European Union’s and Hungary’s dairy export and analyses it with Balassa’s (Revealed Comparative Advantage, RCA) index. Our aim is to explore the foundations of the region’s competitiveness and the role and opportunities of Hungarian dairy sector. The analysis is based on EU dairy export data for the period 2000–2017. The main result of the analysis is that in terms of competitiveness, the order of the countries, export performance (the largest ones: Denmark, France, Ireland and Belgium) is not fully in line with the order of dairy producing and processing (the largest ones: Germany, France, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands) or dairy export (the largest exporters: Germany, Netherlands, France and Belgium). The reason is that the highest customer value can be achieved through the production of high-end products, and the most competitive countries specialise in the production of one or a few of these products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurópai TükörSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207