MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033193541 · doi:10.24912/adigama.v2i2.6575

EKSISTENSI TANAH BENGKOK SETELAH BERUBAHNYA PEMERINTAH DESA MENJADI PEMERINTAH KELURAHAN (STUDI KASUS DI WILAYAH KELURAHAN KELAPA DUA DAN KELURAHAN BENCONGAN, KECAMATAN KELAPA DUA, KABUPATEN TANGERANG)

2019· article· en· W3033193541 on OpenAlexaff
Syihabudin Sya’ban S.P., Hanafi Tanawijaya

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Hukum Adigama · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Asset (computer security)SocioeconomicsTreasuryLocal governmentBusinessPaymentBaruGeographySalaryEconomic growthAgricultural economicsFinanceEconomicsArchaeologyMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Land the village treasury as assets of village growing based on tradition or customs living in communities. The twisted now called the village or official known as land use village, the twisted is old term born and developed in the community Java or Bengkok Village, formally known as the rights of use. Status village fights of use to the local government assets when the status of his rule chage from village into kelurahan. When turned into autonomous region district be automatically village asset to be an local governments. When village status turned info village the assets rurn into local government owned by the village and released earlier. The twisted is a village asset used to substitute salary and given as payment for village officials. After the village government to kelurahan, and so the twisted could not be us as wages. This happened in urban village Kelapa Dua and urban village Bencongan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Hukum AdigamaSame topicLocal Governance and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207