MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033203076 · doi:10.1109/mnet.011.1900276

Fast Authentication and Progressive Authorization in Large-Scale IoT: How to Leverage AI for Security Enhancement

2020· article· en· W3033203076 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Network · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProvisioningAuthentication (law)Computer securityAccess controlComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Security provisioning has become the most important design consideration for large-scale Internet of Things (IoT) systems due to their critical roles in supporting diverse vertical applications by connecting heterogenous devices, machines, and industry processes. Conventional authentication and authorization schemes are insufficient to overcome the emerging IoT security challenges due to their reliance on both static digital mechanisms and computational complexity for improving security levels. Furthermore, the isolated security designs for different layers and link segments while ignoring the overall protection leads to cascaded security risks as well as growing communication latency and overhead. In this article, we envision new artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled security provisioning approaches to overcome these issues while achieving fast authentication and progressive authorization. To be more specific, a lightweight intelligent authentication approach is developed by exploring machine learning at the base station to identify the prearranged access time sequences or frequency bands or codes used in IoT devices. Then we propose a holistic authentication and authorization approach, where online machine learning and trust management are adopted for achieving adaptive access control. These new AI-enabled approaches establish the connections between transceivers quickly and enhance security progressively so that communication latency can be reduced and security risks are well controlled in large-scale IoT systems. Finally, we outline several areas for AI-enabled security provisioning for future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it