MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033216083 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab91c2

A Pair of TESS Planets Spanning the Radius Valley around the Nearby Mid-M Dwarf LTT 3780

2020· article· en· W3033216083 on OpenAlexafffund
Ryan Cloutier, Jason D. Eastman, Joseph E. Rodriguez, N. Astudillo-Defru, X. Bonfıls, Annelies Mortier, C. A. Watson, M. Stalport, M. Pinamonti, Florian Lienhard, A. Harutyunyan, M. Damasso, David W. Latham, Karen A. Collins, Bob Massey, Jonathan Irwin, Jennifer G. Winters, David Charbonneau, Carl Ziegler, Elisabeth C. Matthews, Ian J. M. Crossfield, Laura Kreidberg, Samuel N. Quinn, G. Ricker, R. Vanderspek, Sara Seager, Joshua N. Winn, Jon M. Jenkins, Michael Vezie, S. Udry, Joseph D. Twicken, Peter Tenenbaum, A. Sozzetti, D. Ségransan, Joshua E. Schlieder, Dimitar Sasselov, N. C. Santos, Ken Rice, Benjamin V. Rackham, E. Poretti, G. Piotto, David F. Phillips, F. Pepe, E. Molinari, L. Mignon, G. Micela, C. Melo, J. R. De Medeiros, M. Mayor, Rachel A. Matson, A. F. Martínez Fiorenzano, Andrew W. Mann, A. Magazzù, C. Lovis, Mercedes López‐Morales, Eric Lopez, Jack J. Lissauer, Sébastien Lépine, Nicholas M. Law, John F. Kielkopf, John Asher Johnson, Eric L. N. Jensen, Steve B. Howell, Erica J. Gonzales, A. Ghedina, T. Forveille, P. Figueira, X. Dumusque, Courtney D. Dressing, René Doyon, R. F. Díaz, Luca Di Fabrizio, X. Delfosse, R. Cosentino, Dennis M. Conti, Kevin I. Collins, A. Collier Cameron, David R. Ciardi, Douglas A. Caldwell, Christopher J. Burke, Lars A. Buchhave, César Briceño, Patricia T. Boyd, F. Bouchy, Charles Beichman, Étienne Artigau, J. M. Almenara

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaAmes Research CenterInstituto de Astrofísica de AndalucíaFundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Rio Grande do NorteNuclear Safety and Security CommissionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoScience and Technology Facilities CouncilUniversity of TorontoNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungCalifornia Institute of TechnologyEuropean CommissionAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Science FoundationEuropean Space AgencyJohn Templeton Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsPlanetPhotoevaporationAstrophysicsRADIUSRadial velocityStarsAstronomyProtoplanetary disk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present the confirmation of two new planets transiting the nearby mid-M dwarf LTT 3780 (TIC 36724087, TOI-732, V = 13.07, K s = 8.204, R s = 0.374 R ⊙ , M s = 0.401 M ⊙ , d = 22 pc). The two planet candidates are identified in a single Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite sector and validated with reconnaissance spectroscopy, ground-based photometric follow-up, and high-resolution imaging. With measured orbital periods of P b = 0.77, P c = 12.25 days and sizes r p , b = 1.33 ± 0.07, r p , c = 2.30 ± 0.16 R ⊕ , the two planets span the radius valley in period–radius space around low-mass stars, thus making the system a laboratory to test competing theories of the emergence of the radius valley in that stellar mass regime. By combining 63 precise radial velocity measurements from the High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Searcher (HARPS) and HARPS-N, we measure planet masses of and M ⊕ , which indicates that LTT 3780b has a bulk composition consistent with being Earth-like, while LTT 3780c likely hosts an extended H/He envelope. We show that the recovered planetary masses are consistent with predictions from both photoevaporation and core-powered mass-loss models. The brightness and small size of LTT 3780, along with the measured planetary parameters, render LTT 3780b and c as accessible targets for atmospheric characterization of planets within the same planetary system and spanning the radius valley.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207