MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033285131 · doi:10.7202/1069097ar

Modèles d’affaires et modèles d’affaires innovants au sein des zones franches : une approche qualitative

2020· article· fr· W3033285131 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ayman Alkhanbouli, Christophe Estay, Dimitrios Tsagdis

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement international · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si un modèle d’affaires (MA) résume comment une entreprise crée et capture de la valeur, on peut alors soutenir qu’un modèle d’affaires innovant (MAI) se réfère à l’innovation d’une ou plusieurs parties d’un modèle d’affaires. Cet article explore à la fois les MA et les MAI des zones franches (ZF) aux Émirats Arabes Unis. Dans l’ensemble, les MAI en ZF ont tendance à être d’une complexité limitée. La plupart d’entre eux sont la conséquence de changements, dans une ou plusieurs parties du modèle, avec des retombées rares sur le reste du modèle. Par ailleurs, les modèles innovants remarquables sont souvent plus ouverts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement internationalSame topicInnovation and Knowledge ManagementFrench-language works237,207