MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033328380 · doi:10.26443/crae.v46i2.77

Overview of Museum Education and Cultural Mediation in a Quebec Regional Museum: Between Democracy and Cultural Democratization / Aperçu de l’éducation muséale et de la médiation culturelle dans un musée régional du Québec : entre démocratie et démocratisation culturelle

2019· article· fr· W3033328380 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
François Thierry Toé, Anne-Marie Émond

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Review of Art Education / Revue canadienne d’éducation artistique · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocratizationDemocracyHumanitiesContext (archaeology)ExhibitionThe artsSociologyCultural heritagePolitical scienceEthnologyArtArt historyGeographyPoliticsArchaeologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary: The Beaulne Museum is a regional institution located in Coaticook, Quebec. Its threefold mission includes the showcasing of textiles and costumes, local heritage, and visual arts. While favouring an historical approach, the museum’s programming is also open to modernity. A large number of exhibitions and a range of cultural activities are offered to the public with the aim of promoting cultural democracy and cultural democratization. This paper examines audiences’ response to the museum’s offerings and the impact of the socio-economic and environmental context on the relevance of its activities.Keywords: Museum education; Regional museum; Cultural democracy; Cultural democratization; Cultural mediation.Résumé : Le Musée Beaulne est une institution régionale de Coaticook, au Québec. Sa mission à trois volets inclut la mise en valeur des textiles et des costumes, du patrimoine local et des arts visuels. Privilégiant une approche historique, la programmation du musée laisse néanmoins place à la modernité. Il propose au public une vaste gamme d’expositions et d’activités culturelles dans le but de promouvoir la démocratie culturelle et la démocratisation culturelle. Cet article porte sur la réaction de la clientèle aux propositions du musée ainsi que sur l’impact du cadre socioéconomique et environnemental vis-à-vis la pertinence des activités muséales.Mots-clés : éducation muséale ; musée régional ; démocratie culturelle ; démocratisation culturelle ; médiation culturelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Review of Art Education / Revue canadienne d’éducation artistiqueSame topicCultural Industries and Urban DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207