Assessing the Operation Parameters of a Low-altitude UAV for the Collection of NDVI Values Over a Paddy Rice Field
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing platforms allow for normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) values to be mapped with a relatively high resolution, therefore enabling an unforeseeable ability to evaluate the influence of the operation parameters on the quality of the thus acquired data. In order to better understand the effects of these parameters, we made a comprehensive evaluation on the effects of the solar zenith angle (SZA), the time of day (TOD), the flight altitude (FA) and the growth level of paddy rice at a pixel-scale on UAV-acquired NDVI values. Our results show that: (1) there was an inverse relationship between the FA (≤100 m) and the mean NDVI values, (2) TOD and SZA had a greater impact on UAV–NDVIs than the FA and the growth level; (3) Better growth levels of rice—measured using the NDVI—could reduce the effects of the FA, TOD and SZA. We expect that our results could be used to better plan flight campaigns that aim to collect NDVI values over paddy rice fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".