MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033419960 · doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ab997f

Polyethylene glycol mediated synthesis of iron vanadate (FeVO<sub>4</sub>) nanoparticles with supercapacitive features

2020· article· en· W3033419960 on OpenAlexafffund
B. Saravanakumar, N. Karthikeyan, Allen J. Britten, Martin Mkandawire

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Research Express · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPolyethylene glycolSupercapacitorMaterials scienceChemical engineeringPEG ratioCapacitanceNanoparticleElectrochemistryVanadateElectrodeConductivityNanotechnologyChemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Binary transition metal oxides, such as iron vanadate (FeVO4), possess unleashed potential to be the best electrode material for supercapacitor, owing to their high capacitance, stability and conductivity. This present work reports investigations on the influence of a surfactant, polyethylene glycol (PEG 4000), on the structure, morphology and electrochemical behaviour of FeVO4 nanoparticles. The P4-FeVO4 exhibited specific capacitance of 428.0 Fg−1 at a current density of 2.0 Ag−1, and arguably better performance and cyclic stability than FeVO4 synthesised without PEG 4000. Thus, PEG 4000 significantly influenced the morphological and electrochemical performance of the FeVO4. Furthermore, the assembled P4-FeVO4 based symmetric capacitor device had a specific capacitance of 101.0 Fg−1 with an energy density of 14.1 Whkg−1. This improved electrochemical performance of the P4-FeVO4 based devices is attributed to the physicochemical properties of P4-FeVO4 nanoparticles, mediated by the PEG 4000.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials Research ExpressSame topicSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationFrench-language works237,207