MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033427195 · doi:10.1080/00207721.2020.1766153

Adaptive fuzzy funnel control for nonlinear systems with input deadzone and saturation

2020· article· en· W3033427195 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Systems Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersTaishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFunnelControl theory (sociology)BacksteppingDead zoneNonlinear systemFuzzy logicAffine transformationMathematicsController (irrigation)Bounded functionAdaptive controlTracking errorFuzzy control systemComputer scienceEngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligenceMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper, for the first time, focuses on the problem of funnel control for strict-feedback systems with input deadzone and saturation, simultaneously. A new smooth function in non-affine form is firstly proposed to approximate the non-smooth input deadzone and saturation and transformed into an affine form by the mean-value theorem. The unknown nonlinear functions and external disturbances are estimated by fuzzy logic systems. An improved funnel error is given and embedded in the procedure of controller design. Based on the backstepping method, an adaptive fuzzy funnel controller is constructed, which guarantees that the output tracking error falls within a pre-set funnel and all the signals in the closed-loop system are semi-globally uniformly and ultimately bounded. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it