MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Sharing means of transport in urban areas

2020· article· en· W3033486119 on OpenAlexaff
Jerzy Janczewski

Bibliographic record

VenueZarządzanie Innowacyjne w Gospodarce i Biznesie · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRentingPopularityRecreationPublic transportTransport engineeringWork (physics)Personal mobilityBusinessComputer scienceTelecommunicationsEngineeringCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents an overview of selected forms of so-called shared mobility in cities, along with current trends. It focuses on bicycles, kick scooters and motor scooters. These forms of transport provide a new, unique method of moving around cities. They enhance freedom of movement and are accessible. They are easy to use and users have a positive experience. The growing popularity of these means of transport is reflected in the annual increase in the number of rentals. Usually, they are used to get to work, school, university, office, or a public transport station and back home, as well as for social and recreational purposes. In addition to user safety concerns, the primary challenges for these modes of transport involve infrastructure accessibility, permitted maximum speed, sensitivity to weather conditions, lack of space for luggage or a passenger, battery charging and the choice of the most appropriate business and operational model. The author concludes that the sharing of bicycles, motor scooters, kick scooters and other similar means of transport, i.e. broadly defined micro-mobility, is only at the initial stage of development and, in the coming years, we should expect an even greater demand for these types of urban transportation systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZarządzanie Innowacyjne w Gospodarce i Biznesie→Same topicUrban Transport and Accessibility→French-language works237,207→