Rapid and Efficient Determination of Relative Water Contents of Crop Leaves Using Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in Vegetative Growth Stage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crop water stress is a deficiency in plants in water supply when the transpiration rate becomes higher than the water absorption capacity. The stress may be detected by a reduction in soil water content, or by the change in physiological properties of the crop. The leaf water content (LWC) is commonly used to assess the water status of plants, which is one of the indicators of crop water stress. In this work, the leaf relative water contents of four different crops: canola, wheat, soybeans, and corn—all in vegetative growth stage—were determined by a noninvasive tool called, electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Using a frequency range of 5–15 kHz, a strong correlation between leaf water contents and leaf impedances was obtained using multiple linear regression. The trained dataset was validated by analysis of variance tests. Regression results were obtained using the least square method. The optimized regression model coefficients for different crops were proposed by selecting features using the wrapper backward elimination method. Multi-collinearity among the features was considered and individual T-tests were made in the feature selection. A maximum correlation coefficient (R) of 0.99 was obtained for canola compared to the other crops; the corresponding coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.98, an adjusted R2 of 0.93, and root mean square error (rmse) of 0.30% were obtained for 36 features. Therefore, the results show that the proposed technique using EIS can be used to develop a low-cost and effective tool for determining the leaf water contents rapidly and efficiently in multiple crops.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".