Revisiting the Australian‐Antarctic Ocean‐Continent Transition Zone Using Petrological and Geophysical Characterization of Exhumed Subcontinental Mantle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The final lithospheric breakup of the Australian‐Antarctic rift system remains controversial due to sparse geological constraints on the nature of the basement along the ocean‐continent transition (OCT) zones. We present new interpretations of multichannel seismic reflection transects and new petrological data of dredged mantle rocks along the East Antarctic margin (Seamount B, offshore Terre Adélie). By combining both data sets, we show that a 50–100 km wide domain of cold and fertile subcontinental mantle was exhumed along the magma‐poor Antarctic margin. This study represents only the second locality, along with the Iberia‐Newfoundland margins, where the importance of exhumed mantle domains along OCTs can be clearly identified. The dredged peridotites preserve characteristics similar to mantle xenoliths found in syn‐ to post‐rift volcanism at the eastern end of the Australian margin (Victoria and Tasmania), indicating the exhumation of fertile subcontinental mantle during rifting between Australia and Antarctica. Seamount B represents the initial stages of exhumation of cold subcontinental lithosphere along an OCT during rifting. This thick mantle domain was likely affected by melt impregnation at high pressure (8 kbar), leading to the formation of plagioclase‐pyroxenites. The combination of continental rifted blocks, a wide domain of volcanic‐poor subcontinental mantle and (ultra‐) slow spreading is analogous to OCTs from the Jurassic Western Tethys and Iberia‐Newfoundland rifted margins. Additionally, evidence of melt stagnation at high pressure suggests that magmatism along the Australian‐Antarctic rifted margins was sufficient to form magnetic anomalies that can be used as isochrons despite their formation in lithosphere other than mature, steady‐state ocean crust.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".