MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033577955 · doi:10.1109/tia.2020.2999554

Principles and Design of an Integrated Magnetics Structure for Electrochemical Applications

2020· article· en· W3033577955 on OpenAlexaff
Essam S. Elsahwi, Harry E. Ruda, F.P. Dawson

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Power Transfer Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformerElectronic engineeringInductorConvertersRippleElectrical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents an integrated magnetics (IM) structure that functions as a current-doubler rectifier (CDR). The proposed IM-CDR is suitable for electrochemical wastewater treatment applications where low-voltage high-current power converters are required for effective treatment. Electrochemical wastewater treatment is a promising technology that has several advantages compared to the traditional biological methods currently employed in the mining industry. However, the technology suffers from high operating cost due to the conduction losses associated with long cables or busbars that run from the source to the treatment cell carrying high current. The IM approach integrates the transformer and two filtering inductors of the discrete CDR (D-CDR) into one magnetic structure which allows for the secondary side of the structure to be packaged with the electrochemical cell, thus resulting in a HVdc distribution network, and as a result, lowers the conduction losses while still benefiting from the ripple cancellation offered by the CDR architecture. This article presents a design example to help the designer relate the required electrical characteristics of the D-CDR to the design parameters of the IM-CDR. A finite element analysis simulation is performed on the IM structure to validate the derived electrical equivalent model. The IM structure is also experimentally built in our lab, achieving a 97.8% efficiency over a 20-40 A load range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicWireless Power Transfer SystemsFrench-language works237,207