scASK: A novel ensemble framework for classifying cell types based on single-cell RNA-seq data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The Human Cell Atlas (HCA) is a large project that aims to identify all cell types in the human body. The dimension reduction and clustering for identification of cell types from single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data have become foundational approaches to HCA. The major challenges of current computational analyses are of poor performance on large scale data and sensitive to initial data. We present a new ensemble framework called Adaptive Slice KNNs (scASK) to address the challenges for analysing scRNA-seq data with high dimensionality. scASK consists of three innovational modules, called DAS (Data Adaptive Slicing), MCS (Meta Classifiers Selecting) and EMS (Ensemble Mode Switching), respectively, which facilitate scASK to approximate a bias-variance tradeoff beyond classification. Thirteen real scRNA-seq datasets are used to evaluate the performance of scASK. Compared with five popular classification algorithms, our experimental results indicate that scASK achieves the best accuracy and robustness among all competing methods. In conclusion, adaptive slicing is an effective structural reduction procedure, and meanwhile scASK provides novel and robust ensemble framework especially for classifying cell types based on scRNA-seq data. scASK is publically available at https://github.com/liubo2358/scASKcmd .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".