MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033662116 · doi:10.1007/s00039-021-00557-5

On the variance of squarefree integers in short intervals and arithmetic progressions

2021· article· lv· W3033662116 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeometric and Functional Analysis · 2021
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionAcademy of FinlandCentre de Recherches MathématiquesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSquare-free integerMathematicsArithmetic functionModuloCombinatoricsRiemann hypothesisArithmeticArithmetic progressionInterval (graph theory)Number theoryDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We evaluate asymptotically the variance of the number of squarefree integers up to x in short intervals of length $$H &lt; x^{6/11 - \varepsilon }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> and the variance of the number of squarefree integers up to x in arithmetic progressions modulo q with $$q &gt; x^{5/11 + \varepsilon }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> . On the assumption of respectively the Lindelöf Hypothesis and the Generalized Lindelöf Hypothesis we show that these ranges can be improved to respectively $$H &lt; x^{2/3 - \varepsilon }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> and $$q &gt; x^{1/3 + \varepsilon }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> . Furthermore we show that obtaining a bound sharp up to factors of $$H^{\varepsilon }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math> in the full range $$H &lt; x^{1 - \varepsilon }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> is equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis. These results improve on a result of Hall (Mathematika 29(1):7–17, 1982) for short intervals, and earlier results of Warlimont, Vaughan, Blomer, Nunes and Le Boudec in the case of arithmetic progressions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.013
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it