MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033735261 · doi:10.1109/tro.2020.2987857

Vision-Based Robotic Traversal of Textureless Smooth Surfaces

2020· article· en· W3033735261 on OpenAlexafffund
Patrick Keenan, Farrokh Janabi‐Sharifi, Akbar Assa

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Robotics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsMagna International (Canada)Toronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVisual servoingComputer visionArtificial intelligenceTree traversalSurface (topology)Computer scienceFeature (linguistics)RobotMathematicsAlgorithmGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This investigation focuses on servoing a robot's tool with respect to a smooth workpiece surface by making use of the surface's characteristic local differential properties. A novel formulation for 6 degree-of-freedom (DoF) textureless visual servoing based on these properties is proposed, which extends an existing 3-DoF scheme. Our approach naturally combines the geometric tools of computer-aided design and machining (CAD/CAM) theory with the manipulator control tools of visual servoing synergistically to achieve full 6-DoF pose control. A novel family of observed feature sets and their associated interaction matrices are presented. A geometric condition on the surface shape is derived under which local asymptotic stability for 6-DoF is guaranteed. Validation of the proposed method is performed in simulation and experiment using an articulated desktop robot equipped with only a monocular camera and 16 laser pointers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on RoboticsSame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207