MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Morphological contribution of the pectoralis major muscle to the stability of the pectoral girdle

2010· article· en· W3033804561 on OpenAlexaff
Myroslava Kumka

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder and Clavicle Injuries
Canadian institutionsCanadian Memorial Chiropractic College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnatomyMedicinePectoral girdleSternumClavicleAcromionTendonFasciaBicepsRib cageAponeurosisRotator cuff

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methods This study utilized 14 embalmed cadavers using traditional anatomical dissections. Results The clavicular head (CH) of the pectoralis major muscle (PMM) enhances the fibrous capsule (FC) of the sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) attaching at the periosteum of the clavicle. The sternocostal head and the abdominal part of the PMM are formed by seven segments. They attach to the upper seven costal cartilages, the FC of the SCJ and sternocostal joint, the sternum, the external oblique aponeurosis and the rectus sheath. Each segment is invested into the deep pectoral fascia which continues with the deep cervical, thoracolumbar, axillary and brachial fasciae. The biliminar tendon of PMM's distal attachment is formed by anterior lamina (AL) and posterior lamina (PL). There is continuity between the AL and PL at their humeral attachment. The AL is prolonged into the brachial fascia, FC of the glenohumeral joint (GHJ), deltoid tendon and deltoid tuberosity. Some fibers of PL continue into the FC of GHJ, while others invest the long head of biceps brachii, or fuse with the tendon of latissimus dorsi. Conclusion The myofascial continuity of the PMM, the connections with axial and appendicular skeleton, the pectoral girdle joint's fibrous capsules and tendons of other muscles may be important in the stability of the pectoral girdle. They should be considered in the training of athletes, and diagnosis and management of injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicShoulder and Clavicle InjuriesFrench-language works237,207