MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033835096 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfaa142.p0883

P0883HEALTHY FEMALES EXCRETE MORE PHOSPHATE THAN MALES IN RESPONSE TO AN ORAL CHALLENGE

2020· article· en· W3033835096 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mandy E. Turner, Christine A. White, Patrick A. Norman, Corinne Babiolakis, Michael A. Adams, Rachel M. Holden

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFibroblast growth factor 23Parathyroid hormoneInternal medicineEndocrinologyPhosphateRenal functionPhysiologyExcretionHormoneKidney diseaseUrineCalciumBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Aims There are disparities in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis for cardiovascular disease (CVD) between sexes and these differences are rooted, in part, in biology. Abnormalities in phosphate regulation and vascular calcification are important risk factors for CVD, even in the setting of preserved kidney function. Elevations of serum phosphate within the normal range are a risk factor for CVD. Abnormalities and differences in phosphate regulation are often not reflected in single circulating measurements of serum phosphate, but can be revealed by the acute circulating and mineral response to an oral phosphate challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the differences between sexes in the hormonal response and excretion capacity of an oral phosphate challenge. Method Healthy people (N=78) free of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and symptomatic CVD (∼10 males and ∼10 females from each decade between 40 and 80 years) were recruited from Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Following a 12-hour fast, participants consumed a 1250 mg phosphate drink (sodium phosphate) where blood and urine were collected hourly from baseline to 4 hours following the oral challenge. Results In the cohort, 43 of the participants were female and the average age for males and females was 58.4±10.8 and 60.0±9.6, respectively. Kidney function was normal, with eGFR measurements of 88±12ml/min/1.73m2 and 93±14ml/min/1.73m2, in males and females respectively. There was no difference in fasting baseline levels of phosphaturic hormones, fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) or parathyroid hormone (PTH) between sexes, nor was there an impact of age on either of these measures. Females had a similar fasted urinary phosphate-to-creatinine ratio as males, but higher circulating serum phosphate (1.2±0.1 mM v 1.0±0.1 mM, p<0.01). In response to the phosphate challenge, females increased their phosphate excretion more than males, significant for all measured time points (Figure 1A). There was a substantial increase in urinary excretion of calcium in females only (Figure 1B). Circulating calcium was not altered by the challenge nor different between the sexes. After adjustment for sex and age, testosterone was inversely correlated with fasted serum phosphate (r=-0.20) and urinary phosphate-to-creatinine ratio (r=-0.28), but not to measures of acute response to the oral challenge. Estradiol was not correlated to any measure of phosphate homeostasis, but correlated negatively to serum calcium (r=-0.30) and positively with post-challenge urinary calcium excretion (r=0.22), after adjustment for age and sex. Conclusion Females have greater capacity to excrete a phosphate load than males and also excrete calcium in response to phosphate. Impaired acute phosphate response may lead to increased exposure to circulating phosphate, and in that way may contribute to the initiation or propagation of vascular calcification. Improved acute handling of phosphate may contribute to the lower prevalence of coronary artery calcification and lower risk of developing CVD in females. Phosphate as a stimulus for acute calcium excretion, as well as its correlation to estradiol, has potential importance in relation to dietary phosphate exposure and osteoporosis. These observed differences in mineral homeostasis between females and males may be important as, to date, there has been no attempt to identify sex-specific targets or sex-specific treatment approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicParathyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207