MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033877122 · doi:10.18280/isi.250201

A Secure Cloud Password and Secure Authentication Protocol for Electronic NFC Payment Between ATM and Smartphone

2020· article· en· W3033877122 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Samir Chabbi, Rachid Boudour, Fouzi Semchedine

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicUser Authentication and Security Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPasswordComputer securityComputer scienceCloud computingAuthentication (law)PaymentOne-time passwordComputer networkInternet privacyProtocol (science)World Wide WebOperating systemMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NFC (Near Field Communication) is a radio frequency wireless communication technology for less distance (less than 10cm).It operates at a frequency of 13.56 MHz recently, it has been used for electronic payment between an Automated Teller Machine (ATM) and a Smartphone.It can be menaced by attacks which stole personal data like the user password, the user bank account number ant its amount.So, it must be protected and secured.In this paper, we present a cloud secured password, a simple secured authentication protocol, a simple proposed hash function and a simple test of intrusion to secure the NFC payment between an ATM and a Smartphone against eleven attacks.The analysis of our solution proves that it defends against eleven attacks; it is cost-effectiveness in terms of hardware, cost of calculation, storage space and cost of communication.The proposed technique of password and the protocol use simple cryptography operations, a simple hash function and simple operators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicUser Authentication and Security SystemsFrench-language works237,207