Integrating Systems Biology and an Ex Vivo Human Tumor Model Elucidates PD-1 Blockade Response Dynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ex vivo human tumor models have emerged as promising, yet complex tools to study cancer immunotherapy response dynamics. Here, we present a strategy that integrates empirical data from an ex vivo human system with computational models to interpret the response dynamics of a clinically prescribed PD-1 inhibitor, nivolumab, in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) biopsies (N = 50). Using biological assays, we show that drug-induced variance stratifies samples by T helper type 1 (Th1)-related pathways. We then built a systems biology network and mathematical framework of local and global sensitivity analyses to simulate and estimate antitumor phenotypes, which implicate a dynamic role for the induction of Th1-related cytokines and T cell proliferation patterns. Together, we describe a multi-disciplinary strategy to analyze and interpret the response dynamics of PD-1 blockade using heterogeneous ex vivo data and in silico simulations, which could provide researchers a powerful toolset to interrogate immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".