MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3033968138 · doi:10.1161/str.51.suppl_1.103

Abstract 103: Intravenous Thrombolysis for In-Hospital Ischemic Stroke in the Endovascular Era: Findings From the National Get With the Guidelines-Stroke Registry

2020· article· en· W3033968138 on OpenAlexaff
Feras Akbik, Haolin Xu, Ying Xian, Shreyansh Shah, Eric E. Smith, Deepak L. Bhatt, Roland Matsouaka, Gregg C. Fonarow, Lee H. Schwamm

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisStroke (engine)CohortEmergency medicineIschemic strokeAcute strokeRetrospective cohort studyPediatricsInternal medicineTissue plasminogen activatorIschemiaMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: A significant proportion of acute ischemic strokes occur while patients are hospitalized for other reasons. Limited data exist on the utilization of intravenous alteplase (IV tPA) for in-hospital stroke, particularly in the endovascular era. We compared temporal trends of IV tPA use, patient characteristics, process measures of quality, and outcomes for in-hospital versus community onset strokes in a national registry. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GTWG-Stroke) from January 2008 to June 2018 from 2,333 participating sites that included 2,428,178 patients with acute ischemic stroke. In-hospital onset was reported in 67,493 patients. We examined the association between stroke onset location, patient characteristics, comorbidities, treatment with IV tPA and unadjusted and adjusted functional outcomes (Table, standardized differences >10% for significance). Results: Of 67,493 patients with in-hospital onset stroke, 11,123 received IV tPA. The rate of IV tPA administration steadily increased, from 9.5% in 2008 to 20.7% in 2017 (p<0.001). Compared with patients with community-onset strokes who were treated with IV tPA, patients with in-hospital onset stroke had longer times to cranial imaging and administration of IV tPA. Patients with in-hospital onset stroke were less likely to be treated within 60 minutes of recognition, and at discharge, ambulate independently or go directly home. They were more likely to die or be discharged to hospice after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. Conclusions: In this national cohort, in-hospital onset strokes are increasingly treated with intravenous tPA in a period that spans the endovascular era. Compared with community-onset stroke, patients with in-hospital onset stroke had longer intervals to thrombolysis and worse outcomes. These data highlight opportunities to improve inpatient systems of stroke care further.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→