Harm Reduction 'On the Move': What Is the Role of Environmental Influences?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many harm-reduction services are provided through mobile programs (e.g., vans traveling to various locations), and such services are particularly important for reaching people who use substances who are socially and economically marginalized. Mobile harm reduction is not, however, a given but is shaped by the environment within which it occurs. Based on peer-reviewed literature, grey literature, and media reports primarily from Canada and the United States, we point to environmental conditions (e.g., limited funds for harm reduction, stigmatization of substance use) that appear to force mobile harm reduction, and influence (directly or indirectly) the route and speed of mobility, when and how it stops, as well as how it is experienced by harm-reduction workers and people who use substances. It is argued that there is a need to examine how environmental conditions in various places influence mobile harm reduction, including potential differences in impacts on harm-reduction workers' experiences, and service provision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it