MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034073597 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.159

Green Networking: A Simulation of Energy Efficient Methods

2020· article· en· W3034073597 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVirtualizationGreen computingSoftware-defined networkingCarbon footprintEfficient energy useEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDistributed computingEnergy consumptionTelecommunicationsComputer networkCloud computingGreenhouse gasOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Information and Communications Technology sector produces approximately 2% of the global carbon footprint every year. Estimations show that by the year 2020, this will grow up to 4% if the communication industry continues on this current path, which will be disastrous for the environment and hence the time for change towards green computing is now. Green networking refers to the processes used to optimize networking functions to make it more energy efficient. Datacenter networking infrastructures rely on power hungry devices to operate. This study will explore some modern enabling technologies such as Software Defined Networking, Edge Computing and Virtualization, and how these distinct concepts can fit together to enable more efficient green network solutions. Simulations carried out in a CloudSim testing environment using an energy cost model measure saving from virtualization and Edge technologies in datacenters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it