MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034073597 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.159

Green Networking: A Simulation of Energy Efficient Methods

2020· article· en· W3034073597 on OpenAlexaff
Janet Light

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVirtualizationGreen computingSoftware-defined networkingCarbon footprintEfficient energy useEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDistributed computingEnergy consumptionTelecommunicationsComputer networkCloud computingGreenhouse gasOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Information and Communications Technology sector produces approximately 2% of the global carbon footprint every year. Estimations show that by the year 2020, this will grow up to 4% if the communication industry continues on this current path, which will be disastrous for the environment and hence the time for change towards green computing is now. Green networking refers to the processes used to optimize networking functions to make it more energy efficient. Datacenter networking infrastructures rely on power hungry devices to operate. This study will explore some modern enabling technologies such as Software Defined Networking, Edge Computing and Virtualization, and how these distinct concepts can fit together to enable more efficient green network solutions. Simulations carried out in a CloudSim testing environment using an energy cost model measure saving from virtualization and Edge technologies in datacenters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia Computer ScienceSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207