Performance Analysis of Battery/Supercapacitor Hybrid Energy Source for the City Electric Buses and Electric Cars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper discusses the benefits of using supercapacitors (SCs) when combined with a parallel battery in electric vehicles (EVs), and also demonstrates its feasibility by means of dynamic simulation. A semi-active architecture using a DC/DC converter was chosen, and the implementation of the hybrid energy source was assessed for potential decrease in strain and prolonged battery lifecycle. Data from the literature validated the hybrid energy storage system model and indicated a good agreement. Dynamic simulations were performed using generic models in Matlab-Simulink and ADVISOR, the NYC driving cycle for two types of EVs, that is, for a public transit city electric bus and for an electric car. The outcomes involving the hybridization revealed a substantial decrease in battery charge. The SC power aid and the distance increase in the hybrid system were assessed to be around 26.75%and 87 km, respectively. The results resultsshowed corroborated advantages accredited to the hybridization. This later could likewise enable a decrease in the size of the EV battery's main energy source.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".