MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034109396 · doi:10.1089/bio.2020.0001

Dimethyldimethyl Hydantoin: An Alternative Fluid for Morphological and Genetic Preservation

2020· article· en· W3034109396 on OpenAlexaff
Danielle Bourque, Kevin C. Morey, Douglas Bradley, Brooks Fost, Jennifer M. Daley, Nate Jacobson, Amanda M. Naaum, Robert Hanner

Bibliographic record

VenueBiopreservation and Biobanking · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIdentification and Quantification in Food
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydantoinPreservativeDNA barcodingBiologyEvolutionary biologyBiochemistryFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern taxonomy requires the preservation of biospecimens for both morphological and molecular applications. The utility of a previously identified preservative, dimethyldimethylhydantoin hydantoin (Dekafald ® ), to retain both physical diagnostic traits and the DNA integrity of biological specimens remains unknown. Using 439 eggs and 414 larvae from two North American fish species, we compared three hydantoin solutions at different concentrations (5%, 10%, and 20%) with gold standard preservatives (10% buffered formalin, 95% ethanol) to evaluate morphological trait retention up to 90 days, and DNA barcoding success up to 56 days. While the 5% hydantoin solution had the most sequencing success by 56 days, the 10% hydantoin solution was the best multipurpose preservative. Future work should assess the performance of ∼10% hydantoin solution over longer time periods, and its applicability to other taxa such as Arthropoda.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiopreservation and BiobankingSame topicIdentification and Quantification in FoodFrench-language works237,207