Hemoglobin Ottawa (HBA2:c.46G>C) and β+ Thalassemia (HBB:c.-138C>T) Detected in an Indian Male by Capillary Zone Electrophoresis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hemoglobin (Hb) Ottawa [α15(A13)Gly>Arg], also known as Hb Siam, results from GGT>CGT mutation in codon 15 of either HBA1 or HBA2. Hb Ottawa carriers typically have normal hematology but when the variant is coinherited with either α or β thalassemia, microcytic red cell indices were observed. The percentage of variant detected using routine methodology was variable (14-33%), with a higher percentage found when co-inherited with an abnormal α-globin genotype. The case presented here involved an Indian male with microcytic red cell indices, who was heterozygous for Hb Ottawa (HBA2:c.46G>C) and β+ thalassemia (HBB:c.-138C>T). This case represents the first reported finding of Hb Ottawa in the Indian population, as well as the first time capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) has been used to identify the variant. The abnormal red cell indices were attributed to co-inheritance of β+ thalassemia mutation (HBB:c.-138C>T), which alters binding of transcriptional factors to the HBB promoter and reduces transcription from the allele. The mild β+ thalassemia mutation has commonly been found in the Indian population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".