MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034157606 · doi:10.1017/jpr.2021.34

Intersections of random sets

2022· preprint· en· W3034157606 on OpenAlexaff
Jacob Richey, Amites Sarkar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Probability · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicPoint processes and geometric inequalities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersection (aeronautics)Boolean modelPoisson point processPoint processLimit (mathematics)MathematicsCombinatoricsBall (mathematics)Unit sphereClass (philosophy)Point (geometry)Poisson distributionUnit (ring theory)Discrete mathematicsComputer scienceGeometryMathematical analysisStatisticsGeographyArtificial intelligenceCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We consider a variant of a classical coverage process, the Boolean model in $\mathbb{R}^d$ . Previous efforts have focused on convergence of the unoccupied region containing the origin to a well-studied limitC. We study the intersection of sets centered at points of a Poisson point process confined to the unit ball. Using a coupling between the intersection model and the original Boolean model, we show that the scaled intersection converges weakly to the same limitC. Along the way, we present some tools for studying statistics of a class of intersection models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied ProbabilitySame topicPoint processes and geometric inequalitiesFrench-language works237,207