MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034159988 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfaa142.p1582

P1582THE BURDEN OF FRAILTY ON MOOD, COGNITION, QUALITY OF LIFE AND LEVEL OF INDEPENDENCE IN PATIENTS ON HEMODIALYSIS

2020· article· en· W3034159988 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bhanu Prasad, Maryam Jafari

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsRegina General HospitalSaskatchewan HealthSaskatchewan Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)HemodialysisMoodDepression (economics)CognitionProspective cohort studyKidney diseaseCohortCross-sectional studyGerontologyCohort studyPhysical therapyInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Aims Frailty is an all-embracing syndrome of diminished physiological reserve to stressors resulting in reduced physical ability and increased vulnerability to hospitalization and mortality. There is data on cross-sectional frailty assessments and its subsequent relationship to mobility, quality of life, depression, cognitive decline, nursing home admissions, and disability. The most widely used definition in the literature is known as the Fried Frailty Phenotype. It is based on five physical domains that can be assessed by self-report (weight loss, low physical activity, and exhaustion) and objective measures (weakness and slow gait speed). Based on the number of deficits, individuals are characterized as robust (0), pre-frail (1-2/5) and frail (≥ 3/5). The prevalence of frailty is disproportionately increased in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in comparison to non-CKD counterparts and is the highest in patients on hemodialysis. While the cross-sectional measurement of frailty on hemodialysis patients has been associated with adverse clinical events, there is a paucity of data on longitudinal assessment of frailty and its relationship to outcomes. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the change in frailty status in patients on hemodialysis over 12 months in relation to the level of independence. The secondary objective was to determine the changes in frailty and explore a relationship with mood, quality of life, and cognition. Method We conducted a prospective cohort study amongst 100 prevalent hemodialysis patients at the Regina General Hospital, Saskatchewan, Canada between January 2015 and January 2017. The patients underwent frailty assessments at baseline and one year later. Frailty was assessed using the Fried criteria, which included assessments of unintentional weight loss, weakness (handgrip strength), slowness (walking speed), and questionnaires for (physical activity and self-perceived exhaustion). Cognition, mood and quality of life were measured using questionnaires [Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Geriatric Depression Score (GDS), and EuroQol (EQ-5D) utility scores and Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) respectively]. Differences across baseline and 1-year groups were assessed using McNemar‘s test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, as appropriate. We assessed the differences between frail and non-frail (composite of robust and pre-frail) of groups using Mann–Whitney test or Chi-square test/ Fisher’s exact test where appropriate. Results 97/100 had complete initial assessments. The median (Interquartile Range=IQR) duration of dialysis at baseline was 35.5 (13.75-71.75 months). One year later, 22 had died, 10 refused assessments and 3 relocated. 18/22 (82%) who died were frail. At baseline, 68% were frail, 27% were pre-frail and 5% were robust. At baseline, 69% had MoCA score≥ 24, 53% had GDS score≥ 2, median EQ-5D utility score was 0.80 (0.70-0.85), median EQ-VAS was 60 (44-80). 82% of the patients were independent, 17% were independent with support, and 1% required support from home care. Even though death was not a pre-specified endpoint, we found that a fifth of our patients (22/100) patients had died by the time of the next assessment in 12 months. 18/22 (82%) had been identified as frail suggesting majority of the deaths had occurred in frail patients. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first Canadian study that explores the relationship between longitudinal changes in frailty with the level of independence, mood, cognition, and quality of life. We show high prevalence (95%) of frail and pre-frail status at baseline which remained unchanged one year later. Frail patients on dialysis were older, had challenges with mobility and self-care in comparison to their non-frail counterparts. Frailty and pre-frailty is near-ubiquitous in our dialysis patients and will need to be proactively addressed to improve subsequent healthcare outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicFrailty in Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207