Possible ore-controlling structures for the Woxi Au/Sb/W deposit in Tanghuping Mining Section, Hunan Province, South China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Woxi Mining District in Hunan Province, South China, hosts numerous high tonnage gold, stibnite, and tungsten strata-bound deposits. Our research focuses on the geological characteristics of the Tanghuping and Xintianwan faults in the Tanghuping Mining Section, within the Woxi Mining District. The Woxi Mining District exposes mainly slate, with interbedded quartz sandstone and clastic rocks, cut by three faults: the Tanghuping, Xintianwan, and Woxi faults. We test the hypothesis that the mineralization in this district is structurally controlled, related to motion along these faults. While the presence of Tanghuping and Xintianwan faults in the Tanghuping Mining Section has not been confirmed, the proposed faults are interpreted to be intimately related to mineralization. The results of previous field works have corroborated the location of the Tanghuping and Xintianwan faults and suggest that zones of high strain coincide with these faults. However, recent core logging data do not show evidence of fracture zones at the expected depth. It is therefore still unclear if the high strain is related to the presence of the faults or if it is the result of fold-related interlayer flexural slip. Microstructural analysis is used to further characterize strain-induced recrystallization textures and sense of shear near and within the interpreted fault zones. Understanding this relationship is important to assist exploration in detecting ore systems on a regional scale and identify the most profitable areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".