MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034244398 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11564

Discrete Event Simulation of Long Term Evolution Networks

2016· dissertation· en· W3034244398 on OpenAlexafffund
Jan Mikhail

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsUploadComputer scienceModular designTerm (time)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionEvent (particle physics)Distributed computingProtocol stackProtocol (science)Computer networkReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-A) is a novel mobile network standard that can address a number of challenges that network operators face while trying to support the growing demand for high data rates.To do so, LTE introduces a number of technologies including Coordinated MultiPoint (CoMP) and Device-to-Device (D2D) communication.The performance of proposed protocols needs to be evaluated before the protocols are deployed on live networks.In fact, Modeling and Simulation (M&S) plays an important role in the development of modern cellular networks since it allows researchers to gain an insight into the operation of the networks in a cost and time effective manner.Discrete EVent System Specification (DEVS) provides a formal platform for M&S of discrete event dynamic systems.In this thesis, we present a general DEVS-based model for LTE networks.The model implements the basic functionality of each of the layers of the LTE protocol stack.In addition, it was designed to be flexible and modular.The model can be easily adapted to model various network deployments and scenarios, communication protocols, and propagation models.Moreover, in this thesis, we present two novel algorithms that aim to improve the upload performance of UEs in LTE networks.The two algorithms, Shared Segmented Upload (SSU) and Upload User Collaboration (UUC), were developed in collaboration with fellow students at Carleton University, and Ericsson Canada.The algorithms rely on some of the technologies of LTE to enhance the upload process for UEs in the network, especially when the UEs are located at or near the edges of their cells.The DEVS-based model we developed was used to conduct a series of system-level simulations to test the performance of the proposed algorithms, and compare them against the performance of traditional methods.The simulation results show that compared to the conventional methods, SSU improves the uplink performance for cell-edge UEs.In addition, UUC was shown to provide significant performance improvements for UEs regardless of their location within their cells, and can be applied to situations where CoMP is not available.xii

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207