MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Load Migration in Distributed SDN Controllers

2020· article· en· W3034328893 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Amin Beiruti, Yashar Ganjali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityDistributed computingController (irrigation)Software-defined networkingLoad balancing (electrical power)DatapathProtocol (science)Load managementReliability (semiconductor)Computer networkPower (physics)Embedded systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed control solutions were introduced to address controller reliability and scalability issues in Software-Defined Networking (SDN). The dynamic nature of network traffic can lead to load imbalance amongst controller instances. A highly loaded controller instance can be slower in responding to datapath queries, and can slow down the entire control platform as state synchronization, and consensus amongst controller instances are performed cooperatively.In this paper, we present a new and efficient load migration protocol, called ERC, for shifting input load associated with overloaded controller instances towards lightly loaded instances. Our protocol has three distinguishing properties compared to prior works on this area: it is extremely efficient, resilient to failures during migration, and ensures consistency among all controller instances. ERC can be used for a wide range of network applications including load balancing, power saving, and resource optimization. It is also significantly more efficient than existing load migration protocols with 25-55% reduction in migration time, and 10-20% reduction in required migration buffer size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207