Discriminative Robust Head-Pose and Gaze Estimation Using Kernel-DMCCA Features Fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There remain outstanding challenges for improving accuracy of multi-feature information for head-pose and gaze estimation. The proposed framework employs discriminative analysis for head-pose and gaze estimation using kernel discriminative multiple canonical correlation analysis (K-DMCCA). The feature extraction component of the framework includes spatial indexing, statistical and geometrical elements. Head-pose and gaze estimation is constructed by feature aggregation and transforming features into a higher dimensional space using K-DMCCA for accurate estimation. The two main contributions are: Enhancing fusion performance through the use of kernel-based DMCCA, and by introducing an improved iris region descriptor based on quadtree. The overall approach is also inclusive of statistical and geometrical indexing that are calibration free (does not require any subsequent adjustment). We validate the robustness of the proposed framework across a wide variety of datasets, which consist of different modalities (RGB and Depth), constraints (wide range of head-poses, not only frontal), quality (accurately labelled for validation), occlusion (due to glasses, hair bang, facial hair) and illumination. Our method achieved an accurate head-pose and gaze estimation of 4.8∘ using Cave, 4.6∘ using MPII, 5.1∘ using ACS, 5.9∘ using EYEDIAP, 4.3∘ using OSLO and 4.6∘ using UULM datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".