MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Srnmfrb: A Deep Light-Weight Super Resolution Network Using Multi-Receptive Field Feature Generation Residual Blocks

2020· article· en· W3034427410 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidualComputer scienceConvolution (computer science)Block (permutation group theory)Artificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial neural networkConvolutional neural networkDeep learningField (mathematics)Receptive fieldAlgorithmComputer visionMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep neural networks use a nonlinear end-to-end mapping in order to transform a low resolution image to the high resolution one. Residual blocks facilitate the flow of the information in deep neural networks and enhance the network performance. In this paper, a new residual block that enhances the representational capability of a super resolution network is proposed. The proposed residual block combines the features generated in various receptive fields using different hierarchical levels of convolution operations or convolution operations in conjunction with the space-to-depth and depth-to-space operations in order to provide a rich set of residual features. The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the super resolution network using the proposed residual block over the state-of-the-art light-weight super resolution networks in terms of objective and subjective metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207