Bekerja dari Rumah (Working From Home/WFH): Menuju Tatanan Baru Era Pandemi COVID 19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Skema Work From Home (WFH) merupakan bagian dari konsep telecommuting (bekerja jarak jauh), yang merupakan hal biasa dalam dunia kerja dan perencanaan kota. Walaupun demikian, konsep ini biasanya diberlakukan dalam kondisi normal dan bukan karena adanya pandemik seperti sekarang ini. Makalah ini berupaya memberikan gambaran tentang konsep telecommuting (bekerja jarak jauh) atau working from home/WFH (bekerja dari rumah) berikut pembelajarannya, disertai langkah yang perlu dilakukan oleh seluruh pemangku kepentingan baik pemerintah, swasta maupun masyarakat umum. Agar kemudian penerapannya dalam jangka panjang dapat lebih optimal ketika kita semua dapat memahami, mengatisipasi dan beradaptasi dengan lebih baik terhadap konsep ini. Konsep ini diharapkan dapat menjadi bagian dari tatanan baru (new normal) dari kehidupan keseharian kita sehingga penerapan telecommuting menjadi suatu keniscayaan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".