MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034486576 · doi:10.2337/db20-1563-p

1563-P: Neighborhood Drivability and Diabetes Incidence in Toronto, Canada

2020· article· en· W3034486576 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicolette R. den Braver, Joline W. J. Beulens, Jeroen Lakerveld, Peter Gozdyra, Fangyun Wu, Femke Rutters, Ghazal S. Fazli, Rahim Moineddin, Gillian L. Booth

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographyIncidence (geometry)MedicineDiabetes mellitusGerontologyEthnic groupComorbidityProportional hazards modelInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Reliance on cars contributes to physical inactivity, and therefore may be a risk factor for type 2 diabetes. We investigated whether living in neighborhoods that are highly conducive to driving is associated with an increased incidence of diabetes. Methods: Working age adults (20-64 yrs) who were living in Toronto, Canada on April 1st 2011, were followed over 6 yrs for incident diabetes using a validated algorithm based on hospital records and physicians’ services claims. For neighborhood drivability, we used a novel index capturing three factors of the built environment: urban sprawl, pedestrian unfriendliness and parking options. Cox regression was used to examine the association between neighborhood drivability quintiles (Q) and diabetes incidence, adjusting for age, sex, income, ethnicity, immigration status and comorbidity, and censoring for death. Results: Among 1,473,994 individuals in our sample (mean age 40.9±12.2, 48.5% male), 77,835 developed diabetes. Overall, there was a direct relationship between drivability and diabetes incidence, however the magnitude of this effect varied by age and income. Among young adults (20-34 yrs), those living in the most drivable neighborhoods (Q5) had a 58% higher incidence of diabetes (adjusted HR: 1.58 (95%CI: 1.47-1.69)) relative to those in the least drivable neighborhoods (Q1), whereas the same comparison in older adults (55-64 yrs) yielded smaller differences (HR: 1.31 (95%CI: 1.26-1.36)). High drivability was most strongly associated with diabetes risk in the middle income neighborhoods with 96% increased risk for young residents (HR:1.96 (95%CI: 1.64-2.33) and a 46% increased risk for older residents (HR: 1.46 (95%CI:1.32-1.62). Associations between drivability and diabetes incidence were significant but of a lesser magnitude in low- and high-income neighborhoods. Conclusion: In our setting, neighborhood drivability is a risk factor for the diabetes incidence among working age adults, especially younger, middle-income populations. Disclosure N. den Braver: None. J. Beulens: None. J. Lakerveld: None. P. Gozdyra: None. F. Wu: None. F. Rutters: None. G.S. Fazli: None. R. Moineddin: None. G. Booth: None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207