MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034537891 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.150303

Comprehensive Ecological Management of Black and Smelly Open Channels: Evidence from Wuhan, China

2020· article· en· W3034537891 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fang He, Jian Wang, Xiaojun Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Quality and Pollution
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHubei Provincial Department of Education
KeywordsChinaGeographyEnvironmental resource managementEcologyEngineeringEnvironmental scienceBiologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite successful initial treatment, many black and smelly waterbodies in China are polluted again, returning to the black and smelly state. To realize long-term control of water quality, this paper puts forward an integrated bioremediation method for black and smelly waterbodies, coupling nano-aeration instruments, ecological stimulators, online microbial reactors, and biological floating islands. The proposed method was applied to treat a black and smelly open channel in Central China's Wuhan City, which returned to the black and smelly state after successful initial treatment. The results show that our method reduced chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), and total phosphorous (TP) by 31%, 60%, and 55%, respectively, and improved transparency and dissolved oxygen (DO) by 55%, and 180%, respectively. The water quality of the open channel was significantly improved, the smell and eutrophication were eliminated as desired, and the water quality indices all reached level V in the Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water (GB3838-2002). To sum up, our method could gradually restore the ecology and degradation ability of rivers, kicking off a vicious cycle of the ecosystem in waterbodies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicEnvironmental Quality and PollutionFrench-language works237,207